To begin at the beginning, it is a fact that “First Nations
First Nations
A term that came into common usage in the 1970s to replace the word “Indian,” which some people found offensive. Among its uses, the term refers to the Status, Non-Status and Treaty Indians of Canada. Some Aboriginal peoples have replaced the word “Band” in the name of their community with the term “First Nation,” respecting their distinct language, culture, heritage and systems of knowledge. Although “First Nation” is widely used, it has no legal definition.
Thus, a person might say that they’re from the Naskapi First Nation of Kawawachikamach, or the Atikamekw First Nation of Manawan, or the Mohawk First Nation of Akwesasne, etc., identifying both the nation to which they belong and their place of origin or residence.
The term Indian is still used legally to refer to people with Indian status under the Indian Act, which is still in force in Canada. However, it is considered outdated and should be replaced with First Nation or member of a First Nation.
”) and lands reserved for them” are governed exclusively by the federal government, unlike other citizens. This is one of the characteristics of their special status. First Nations
Nations
A group sharing a common culture, history and language.
peoples are distinct citizens and have been distinct citizens ever since the French regime
French regime
From 1608 to 1759, to govern New France, the king delegated his powers to various administrators who were responsible for applying French policies.
. However, the federal government has governed their lives by means of a special act, the Indian Act, since 1876. As we will see further on, this law of exception does not apply to all Aboriginal people, since Inuit in particular are excluded from it.
The federal government’s exclusive responsibility for First Nations people is derived from the Proclamation of 1763, that famous document in which the Crown affirmed its responsibility to provide “protection” for the “several Nations or Tribes of Indians with whom We are connected”, in the words of the King.
However, in reality, the Indian Act distorted this responsibility of protection by essentially making the nations and tribes to be protected wards or children of the state. In the name of protection, the government would decide what was in their best interests.