Alleged Preferential Treatment Regarding Hunting and Fishing Rights

Aboriginal peoples have always retained significant hunting, fishing and trapping rights that are distinct from those enjoyed by other Quebecers. In some cases, Aboriginal people enjoy priority, and even exclusive, rights. Interest groups often attempt to make this out to be a form of preferential treatment or even discrimination against non-Aboriginal citizens but in Chapter 4 we saw that the existence of distinct rights is not incompatible with the affirmation of the right to equality enshrined in our charters of rights and freedoms. Special situations may demand that if certain groups are to have equality, they must have distinct rights. That is why, since 1982, the Canadian Constitution has formally recognized that Aboriginal peoples have special rights because they occupied the territory prior to the arrival of Europeans: this is what is meant by “Aboriginal rights.” In the case of the Cree, Inuit and Naskapi beneficiaries of treaties with the governments of Québec and Canada, they are referred to as “treaty rights and freedoms.”

Moreover, the right of ethnic minorities to maintain and develop their own cultural interests with the other members of their group is a human right protected by section 43 of the Québec Charter of human rights and freedoms. Their right to enjoy their own culture is also protected under international law, by virtue of article 27 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. More recently, the United Nations Human Rights Committee observed that “culture manifests itself in many forms, including a particular way of life associated with the use of land resources, especially in the case of indigenous peoples.” The Committee went on to state that the enjoyment of cultural rights “may require positive legal measures of protection and measures to ensure the effective participation of members of minority communities in decisions which affect them.” (United Nations 1994, 3-4)

The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, adopted in 2007 and discussed in Chapter 4, goes much further in recognizing the rights of Indigenous peoples. It clearly states that, as distinct peoples, Indigenous peoples have the right “to be secure in the enjoyment of their own means of subsistence and development, and to engage freely in all their traditional and other economic activities.” (art. 20-1) Indigenous peoples also “have the right to the lands, territories and resources which they have traditionally owned, occupied or otherwise used or acquired.” (art. 26-1) Accordingly, states have a duty to “give legal recognition and protection to these lands, territories and resources… with due respect to the customs, traditions and land tenure systems of the indigenous peoples concerned.” (art. 26-3) (United Nations 2007)

Aboriginal peoples’ traditional hunting, fishing and trapping pursuits testify to a special kind of land use. overnments have tried to control these activities since the 1930s, a time when wildlife and the Aboriginal way of life were threatened by the abusive practices of non-Aboriginal people. To address the situation, Québec, in cooperation with the federal government, established an extensive network of hunting reserves for fur-bearing animals. This network of sanctuaries and reserves, commonly referred to as “beaver reserves,” still exists. The network is an impressive 232,500 km2 in size, covering nearly 80 per cent of Québec. Each beaver reserve is subdivided into family hunting grounds where Aboriginal people have the exclusive right to trap fur-bearing animals. However, this system did not protect Aboriginal people against concurrent development activities. All too often in the past, Aboriginal families would find themselves in a forest company’s lumberyard or see their land flooded or otherwise affected by development, as if they did not even exist.

Preparing a community dinner in Waswanipi. On the menu: beaver and goose.

Photo credit:  Shirley Sarna, August 2003

This special system, although little known to the general public, shows that the rights and activities of Aboriginal people extend far beyond the confined area of an Indian reserve. Reserves are parcels of land set aside for the permanent residence of most First Nations communities. This system also shows that Québec is not a wasteland, but rather a territory in respect of which Aboriginal peoples have a sense of belonging and responsibility.

Furthermore, the widely held view that Aboriginal people are not subject to any hunting or fishing rules or restrictions is far from true. Several years ago, the Ilnu (Innu) community of Mashteuiatsh in Saguenay – Lac-Saint-Jean showed leadership by establishing a system of territorial officers and adopting a code of practice for wildlife harvesting. And it is not alone. A number of First Nations communities have adopted systems for closely monitoring wildlife harvesting. In 2014, the Ekuanitshit Innu in the Côte-Nord region adopted a fishery regulation to foster the long-term survival of salmon in the Romaine river and sustain subsistence fishing in the river. (Conseil des Innus 2014) As well, the Innu community of Uashat mak Mani-utenam adopted a salmon-fishing code for the Moisie river. The same as in other communities, territorial officers are responsible for ensuring best practices. In the Gaspésie, the Listuguj Mi’gmaq First Nation adop­ted its own fishery regulation to prohibit the catching of adult salmon and thereby contribute to salmon conservation efforts in the Restigouche and Kedgwick river basins in New Brunswick. (Radio-Canada 2013) And since 2015, area wardens from the Huron-Wendat Nation have been trained as wildlife protection assistants. Primarily assigned to the Tourilli sector of the Parc des Laurentides, these new wildlife protection assistants ensure that fishers and hunters comply with quotas and also intervene in cases of poaching or other unlawful acts. (Conseil de la Nation huronne-wendat 2017) These are just a few examples. 

The Mistissini Beaver Reserve was created in 1948.

Photo credit:  Jos Morin, Archives nationales du Québec à Québec

In the early 1950s, the beaver was re-introduced into certain parts of Québec where it was virtually extinct. Here, naturalists capture beavers with the aid of two First Nations members. Beavers were transported from the Abitibi region to other regions by air. The operation proved successful, as did the establishment of the hunting reserves for fur-bearing animals commonly referred to as “beaver reserves”.

Photo credit:  Jos Morin, Archives nationales du Québec à Québec

Since 2016, the Indigenous nations of Québec and Canada have joined forces to create the National Indigenous Guardians Network.

Already more than 30 Indigenous communities in Canada have established or are pursuing guardian programs. These combine the strengths of their own systems of governance, cultures and knowledge with western science to protect and monitor the land and marine areas that have sustained them for millennia, but are now under threat from resource development and environment pressures.

Indigenous Leadership Initiative 2016

The National Indigenous Guardians Network is an Indigenous-led, federally funded initiative. There is a similar program in Australia and it has been hugely successful.

HUNTING PRESERVES FOR FUR-BEARING ANIMALS (BEAVER PRESERVES) Boundaries of hunting preserves

Photo credit:  Government of Québec map, Négociations CAM, (August 1989).

TRAPPING GROUNDS OF THE COMMUNITIES OF SEPT-ÎLES AND SCHEFFERVILLE Trapping ground Note: The trapping grounds have been registered without regard for the Labrador border.

Photo credit:  Lots de piégeage, Réserve de castors Saguenay, Division Sept-Îles, sud-ouest, Ministère du Loisir, de la Chasse et de la Pêche, February 1985.

Territorial Officers to Ensure Best Practices

In 1985, the Ilnu (Innu) community of Mashteuiatsh established a system of territorial officers and adopted codes of practices for hunting, fishing and the trapping of fur-bearing animals. An important message was being conveyed to members of the community, that is, individuals who commit an offence under provincial laws related to wildlife, hunting and fishing will not get the Band Council’s support if they were violating the code of practice for the activity concerned. They may even be subject to sanctions, including temporary suspension of the right to practise the given activity, depending on the offence. (Pekuakamiulnuatsh Takuhikan 2008) The code of practice for wildlife harvesting, currently in effect, includes measures such as the registration of catches, gauges permitted for hunting, and prohibited practices.

Photo credit:  Pekuakamiulnuatsh Takuhikan (Conseil des Ilnus de Mashteuiatsh)

The code covers the sale, gifting, trading and sharing of game, authorized hunting and fishing periods, and so forth. In addition, a land occupation and use code sets forth the environmental rules regarding construction of camps and the management method for traditional lands, including beaver reserves. The latter code also sets forth the duties and responsibilities of guardians of family territories. Both codes are preceded by a code of ethics that are integral to the code of conduct.

The system of territorial officers and the code of practice are of particular interest in terms of self-government. The rules introduced are grounded in Ilnu tradition and wildlife conservation practices. 

Territorial officer.

Photo credit:  Pakuakamiultnuatsh Takuhikan (Conseil des Ilnus de Mashteuiatsh)

Historic Agreement on Caribou Preservation and Management

On October 17, 2017, seven Indigenous nations signed an agreement to preserve and manage caribou in the Ungava Peninsula. The combined population of the George River and Leaf River caribou herds peaked in the 1990s and has been in steep decline in recent years. The agreement is the result of four years of meetings of the Ungava Peninsula Caribou Aboriginal Round Table (UPCART), whose membership is composed of the Inuit of Nunavik, the Inuit of Nunatsiavut (Labrador) and the NunatuKavut Community Council (southern Labrador), the Naskapi Nation of Kawawachikamach, the Grand Council of the Crees of Eeyou Istchee, the Innu Nation of Labrador and the Innu communities of Québec. UPCART Co-Chair Adamie Delisle Alaku, of Makivik Corporation, called the agreement historic and unprecedented: “We believe there is no other agreement of this kind in Canada between Indigenous peoples for cooperative wildlife management. Caribou has always been a vital part of our Indigenous culture – spiritually, culturally, as well as providing food, shelter, and clothing.” (Uashat mak Mani-Utenam 2017) The agreement provides for Indigenous sharing of the resource, a research and monitoring plan and a habitat management and environmental impact plan.

Representatives of seven Indigenous nations during the signing ceremony for the historic agreement on the preservation and management of caribou in the Ungava Peninsula.

Photo credit:  Courtesy of TRACPU

Photo credit:  Jean Lafrance

This site is registered on wpml.org as a development site. Switch to a production site key to remove this banner.